http://idg-computerworld.disqus.com/enTue, 11 Sep 2012 13:05:58 -0000http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9230802/Blind_and_online_Progress_not_perfection_for_visually_impaired_Web_users#comment-646833696<p>This is pretty ironic really, the website, this one here, has some sort of dynamic content switcher that makes it very difficult for screen readers to read the article content, because the content keeps getting jerked up and down as the reader tries to navigate using the arrow keys.<br>Very amusing...<br>Sincerely,Bryan <a href="Garaventahttp://www.linkedin.com/in/bgaraventa" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Garaventahttp://www.linkedin.com/in/bgaraventa">Garaventahttp://www.linkedi...</a></p>Bryan GaraventaTue, 11 Sep 2012 13:05:58 -0000http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9230802/Blind_and_online_Progress_not_perfection_for_visually_impaired_Web_users#comment-646669277<p>Sorry my name didn't attach to this post.</p>Roy_ColeTue, 11 Sep 2012 09:35:30 -0000http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9230802/Blind_and_online_Progress_not_perfection_for_visually_impaired_Web_users#comment-646648087<p>They don't.  That's why this is commercial.</p>Jade VexTue, 11 Sep 2012 09:05:05 -0000http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9230802/Blind_and_online_Progress_not_perfection_for_visually_impaired_Web_users#comment-646644975<p>Apple does something better than Microsoft (which is the norm as of late) and this is your typical response? Can you actually make a comment that is relevant for a change?</p>Kent_DorfmanTue, 11 Sep 2012 08:59:29 -0000http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9230802/Blind_and_online_Progress_not_perfection_for_visually_impaired_Web_users#comment-646614489<p>What an obvious and especially callous Apple commercial. Impaired vision interfaces are neither new nor something Apple came up with.</p>Jade VexTue, 11 Sep 2012 08:01:47 -0000